labricoleuse: (CAD)
I went ahead and splurged on the myPANTONE app, which seemed almost too good to be true: the entire Pantone color library accessible on my iPad, anywhere, any time? Think of what a fantastic resource that would be as a dyer!

But myPANTONE at $9.99 is fairly expensive for an app...at least it seems that way until you start looking at the pricetags on the analog versions of Pantone colorguides, and you realize that a single basic Formula Guide printed on cardstock is going to run you upwards of $125, nevermind the combined cost of all the different libraries included in the app. Suddenly that ten-dollar price starts looking like a mega-deal. So i bought it.

I can't tell you how many shows i've worked on at theatres that didn't have a Pantone book for picking dye colors out of, where a designer had to find a scrap of fabric from a remnant pile ("Like this but more punchy!" Uh, what?), or an assistant had to run to the nearest hardware store for paint chips. Imagine though if a designer could whip out her iPhone and pick a Pantone swatch right then, and later a dyer could pull out his iPad and refer to it while processing the job? You see where i'm going in terms of this being a potentially excellent tool for the theatre, where maybe a shop manager just can't justify a $150 expenditure for the Pantone formula guide, but a $10 app could be the answer to everyone's frustrations about dye-swatching.

Not an iPhone user? The Android version is $2 cheaper at $7.99.

There are also a couple of related Pantone apps that look fairly useless for the purposes of a dyer/costumer--myPANTONE Wedding ($5, only 200 colors and geared toward product sales of wedding attire/accessories) and myPANTONE X-Ref ($2, converts Pantone color numbers across system libraries, but isn't searchable/browsable across the spectrum for any of them).

So, from the perspective of a costumer, what can i tell you about myPANTONE? Overall, i find it pretty exciting.

You can fan through a deck of color swatches easily and swiftly, then maximize visibility on a specific 5-value color card or individual color chip (each of which is labeled with the Pantone number).

You can search on a swatch number and call up that chip easily. If an out-of-town designer with the app were to email me and say "Hey, dye those t-shirts Pantone 339C," i could search on the number and immediately see the swatch for the color s/he wanted the shirts dyed.

You can even take a picture of something and pick out a swatch from the image. To test this, i took a photograph of one of the costumes on the rack at work, a set of blue medical scrubs, then touched the sleeve of the shirt in the photo, and the app popped up a Pantone swatch matched to that scrub color!

There is, however, a pretty big caveat, and that is that the colors that show up on your mobile device screen DO NOT exactly match the colors of the printed Pantone colorbooks. I haven't tested it across platforms so i don't know if the colors on my iPad exactly match the ones on the Android version of the app, or the iPhone version. I have to wait i guess until someone else i know buys it to see.

The colors *are* close enough that you could probably run with a dye request from the app in most cases, since a textile's weave structure has just as much influence over how a color appears to the eye as a difference in handheld displays. Think about how different the same exact color of dress looks if the dress is acetate velvet, or silk satin, or cotton broadcloth. So while this caveat is an issue, i don't think it is nearly the same significant problem for dyers and costume designers in theatre as it is for, say, graphic designers.

In short, i'm glad i bought the app, and I'm hoping it becomes something that's fairly standard in theatrical production, in terms of a resource that designers and dyers can have easily and inexpensively for color communication.

Do you have myPANTONE? What do you think of it?
labricoleuse: (frippery)
Ok, so i almost never do product advocacy here, and when i do it's usually something like a new reference book that's come out or a new line of textile paints or whatever. But bear with me, because i'm actually about to tell you about pajamas.

And, you might think this is topical--there are several characters who wear pajamas in Angels in America, and that's the show i've been posting about of late. But, no. It is literally about pairs of actual pajamas, one of which i'm wearing even as i type this entry.

See, recently Kathleen Fasanella a patternmaker for the fashion industry and author of The Entrepreneur's Guide to Sewn Product Making, posted a product review of some pajamas on her Fashion Incubator blog. For Kathleen to speak highly of the construction details of any sewn product is in and of itself a good recommendation in my book--but they also had this cool print on them of what appeared to be snowflakes at first, but then upon closer inspection turned out to be images of rhinestone brooches. How perfect is that, for a crafts artisan? Heck, i just stitched a vintage brooch like that onto a hat last month!

Then i paged through some more of the offerings at Soma, and came across these pajamas, covered with images of hat styles surmounting eyes and lips. Toppers! Cloches! And on sale, no less! How could i resist?

So, i thought perhaps i would share it here, in case there are pajama-seekers among my readership similarly swayed by such things. Kathleen was right, they are well-put-together. My only criticism (and one she mentioned as well) is that they are sold as separates instead of as a set. I guess though if you only want bottoms or a top, that's a plus though.
labricoleuse: (dye vat)
So, Rit dye.

You'll find a lot of differing opinions on Rit and other union dyestuffs in the theatre industry--some folks love them, others hate them, and everything in between. Whether you are positively or negatively inclined toward such dyes, the fact is, in many theatre dyeshops across the country, you find a stock of Rit and/or Dylon and/or Tinfix, and you need to be familiar with using them to the best of their abilities because it might be all you've got in a pinch. As such, we stock the whole Rit range and the first thing we discuss in my dye class is union dyes.

In addition to the small packets of powder and bottles of concentrate that you can buy in grocery stores and fabric shops, Rit sells larger quantities to industry through their Professional Line in 1-lb. and 5-lb. jars of powder, and 5-gallon pails of liquid concentrate. My aim here isn't to discuss the merits and faults of union dyes; it's to solicit opinions on Rit's new packaging of their industrial powder dyes from those who use them. I don't use this blog as a platform for rants or whining, so please don't infer that tone or subtext from this post; I'll cop to being personally dissatisfied with the new packaging, but what i really want to hear is how others feel about it. Is it just me? Is there some advantage to the new packaging that's escaping me? Is there some justification for the change i don't know about? Etc.

Let's look at the range of Rit powder packaging and compare.

Read more... )

ETA 9/30/08: [livejournal.com profile] jaguarx13 had the excellent suggestion of a letter-writing campaign. Should you wish to participate, the contact information for the company is here:

Rit Dye/Phoenix Brands LLC
300 Atlantic Street, 11th floor
Stamford, CT 06901
203-975-0319
866-794-0800

I suggest a traditional paper letter, as I've still received no response--not even an autoresponse--to email.
labricoleuse: (silk painting)
Today was the first full day of the USITT Costume Commission's Fabric Modification Symposium, a three-day extravaganza of classes, presentations, hands-on activities, and more hosted by UNC-Chapel Hill at our Center for Dramatic Art. I thought that i was going to be an assistant to one of the presenters, but it turns out that instead, i got to be a "floater," checking out all of the first day's worth of classes! I took a ton of behind the scenes photographs and even participated in some of the seminars.

Thirty-five costume professionals from the US and Canada are attending, and we divided up into four groups, which rotated through the series of four different classes. The classes are taught over two days, with a "break" day in the middle (tomorrow) to allow some of the projects to cure/set/etc. So, today was the first day, and we'll do a second day worth of work on these things on Saturday.

The classes are as follows (i'll list them in the order that my group went through them):

1.) Screenprinting with EZ Screen, taught by Jeff Lieder. Jeff is a costume designer, a professor at U-Wisc Milwaukee, and has served as the Costume Director of the Utah Shakespearean Festival for the past 18 years.

2.) Devore and Discharge printing, taught by Colleen Muscha. Colleen is a costume designer and head of the Costume Design MFA program at Florida State University.

3.) Rubberama (silicone caulk techniques on spandex), taught by Janet Bloor. Janet is head of the NYC-based costume studio EuroCo Costume Company and co-author of the book, Rubber: Fun, Fashion, Fetish.

4.) Arashi Shibori, taught by Lori Hartenhoff. Lori is a fiber artist and Costume Director at Northern Illinois U.

pix and technique overviews! )
labricoleuse: (Default)
A quick update before the New Year: I wanted to share a tradition in my department at work, the Historic Fashions Calendar Series by Sally Queen & Associates.

Our Costume Director traditionally gives everyone a copy of the calendar at our holiday party--it's twelve months of in-depth costume photography, history, and analysis, with a different theme each year. Last year's theme, for example, was American-Western Costume (as in, cowboys, rodeo, saloon-girls, etc.); previous topics have been "Shoes," "Undergarments," and "The Wedding Dress."

This year, it's "Costume in Performance," showgirl headdresses, cabaret gowns, opera singers, etc.

You can read more about the 2007 calendar here:

http://www.ttup.ttu.edu/BookPages/0896725782.html

...and check out previous editions of the calendar on the general Texas Tech University Press site in their series overview section:

http://www.ttup.ttu.edu/browsebyseries.html

Have a happy and safe new year's, everyone, and i look forward to presenting a host of articles on hatmaking and shoemaking in the coming months!
labricoleuse: (Default)
In the safety course i'm taking (Principles of Industrial Health and Safety for the Entertainment Industry), we have recently conducted formal hazard assessments for various tools and equipment commonly--or not-so-commonly!--found in our shops. We were encouraged to choose either a tool currently owned by the shop that might present particular safety issues, or a tool that we would like to purchase for the shop but not currently available.

I thought i'd share my overview here, both in terms of discussing costume craftwork applications for the tool i chose (an industrial heat press) and to present a framework you might choose to adopt or adapt, should you find yourself in a position to be documenting tool hazard assessments for your own facility.

The particular products i chose were these heat presses by Geo Knight & Co., designed for light usage. I chose the light-usage press because even with frequent use in a theatrical costuming context, they don't need to stand up to the sheer volume of usage that, say, a t-shirt manufacturing house might put them through, setting thousands of transfers per day, all day every day. They also fall into the range of being fairly affordable--$279 and $495 respectively.

The obvious use for the professional costumer is in transfer applications--it's very effective with the various "iron-on" printer papers, hobby and industrial heat-transfers, iron-on fabric applique techniques, and in quickly processing the application of a large amount of fusible interfacings and the like. It is also helpful in heat-setting textile paints and screenprinting inks, and can be used to stiffen up Fosshape thermoformable felt as well. These presses are fairly straightforward and simple to operate, and not very hazardous providing the user has been properly trained in their use.

I last worked with a heat press of this sort in the craft shop of the Los Angeles Opera, where we used it for a variety of craft and millinery applications, and boy, have i been starved for one here at my current employer! My dyeing and painting students have been heat-setting various class projects using a standard industrial iron, which allows for a much higher margin of operator error than these presses do. Instead of trying to get a uniform coverage and uniform temperature/time application by moving a hand-iron over an area, the presses allow you to accurately set the temperature of the heat surface (called the "platen") and the duration for which the press will engage.

Note: Usages above require the guarding of the platen with a presscloth or other barrier. Melting plastics and inks to the platen is hazardous and may also damage the press.

Also! I do not recommend the use of these types of presses to apply dimensional heat-transfer products such as heat-set rhinestones and nailheads. There are better tools for applying these products, such as jewel-setting irons.


So, what does an "official" tool hazard assessment of this piece of equipment look like?

This! )

Ideally, you would create these kinds hazard assessments for all the equipment in your shop. You would keep these on file in your record library and use them to determine proper operating and training procedures.
labricoleuse: (shoes!)
So, the show finally closed and everything's come back from wardrobe to be restocked and i can give you guys the followup on how 1812 industrial adhesive performed as a substitute for Barge.

The verdict is: a cautious hooray!

I wound up sending two pairs onstage with soles rubberized using 1812, and one pair with the ol' toxic standby, Barge. During the course of a month's run, one of the Barged pair dropped its rubber under the ball of the foot and had to be reglued. This is pretty much par for the course, IME, particularly with very active performers--there's always one shoe that the bond somehow didn't set right on that has to get redone at some point in the run. Both pairs rubberized using 1812 did have peelage in the instep of the arch, but that was easily fixed by reapplying the glue and clamping it good overnight. I think also some of the peeling might be chalked up to my learning curve on working with the medium. I just rubberized another pair of shoes and sent them into rehearsal for a new show, so we'll see if those peel as well, or if the bond is better now that i'm getting into the swing of using the adhesive. All told though, it seems really promising as a good quality Barge replacement!

In other shoe news, anyone who's used those rubber-foam-soled gladiator sandals that International Male sells knows, those bastards always split right through the middle of the sole. Seriously, all the way through, every pair it seems! What a design flaw. They usually can handle maybe a 3-week run of a show, but then they're worthless, the sole all flapping like granny's jaw. I need some for my event that's coming this Saturday though for an ancient Greek character, and we've got a pair but of course the sole's split.

Today i'm trying a new idea for fixing those, and if it works, i'll let you know how it goes. I've repaired the crack with Gorilla Glue, and "clamped" it back together using a staplegun, shooting the staples down into the cracks of the tread so that in theory, i can just leave the staples IN the sole (they are short enough not to come close to penetrating the footbed of the shoe, of course, for actor safety). If it works, i might have just found a way to make those damn shoes wear longer, which would be great, since they are indispensable for shows set in that period.
labricoleuse: (shoes!)
So, i don't feel like i can call this a tutorial, because this adhesive is fairly new to the theatre industry and definitely new to me. It was first recommended in the ACTS FACTS newsletter back in 2003 as a safer substitute for the carcinogenic solvent-based shoe-rubbering adhesive, Barge, by safety expert Monona Rossol. Ms. Rossol is reknowned for her work in furthering safety education among artists and craftspeople and is the author of many reference books on the subject, including The Health & Safety Guide For Film, TV, & Theater. Our company has recently acquired 5 gallons of the 1812, and i decided to test it out and see how it works!

1812 looks like a white glue--water-based, runny--but as it dries it goes through several phases, one of which is kind of slimy and weird like the floaty egg bits in egg drop soup, and finally ends up as firm rubber. I don't know where to tell you to purchase it easily--i know that we got it wholesale straight from the manufacturer, which is UPACO, a division of Worthen Industries. I predict that this will be one of those products that, like Foss Manufacturing's group of thermoformable plastics and felts, quickly becomes purchasable from retail businesses that cater to the entertainment industry, like Manhattan Wardrobe Supply and Backstage Hardware & Theatre Supply.

So, here's my "guinea pig" pair of boots:

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

ten more pictures illustrating what i discovered... )
labricoleuse: (vintage hair)
Heat-set crystals (aka "iron-on rhinestones") are an embellisher's dream--they are easy and quick to apply, bond durably, and look like a million Broadway bucks. They come in a wide range of shapes, sizes, and colors, including the Vegas showgirl favorite, "aurora borealis."

How do they work? They're exactly what they sound like: a faceted Austrian crystal with a coating of heat-activated adhesive on the back. There are a variety of ways of applying them, using both standard shop equipment and specialty tools.

For Cavalier costumes at the Boston Ballet, my draper insisted that we lay the crystals down, glue side up, in the pattern we wanted upon the ironing table, then gently place the costume pieces in position on top of them and apply the iron from the backside of the fabric. I found this to be effective, but not error-free--sometimes the stones would shift in the application process. It was a good way to put a scattering on all at once, but not useful for maintaining acute control over where the stones wound up attached.

A costumer at Disney in Los Angeles insisted that tweezers and a hotplate was the way to go for accuracy--scatter the stones on the hotplate, glue side up, then place them one by one where you wanted using the tweezers.

My preferred method is to go ahead and buy the specialty tool that heat-set crystal vendors sell called a bejeweling iron or a BeJeweler(tm). It's like a soldering iron with interchangeable tips for various diameters of stones. For speediest application, i set up 2 or 3 of the bejeweling tools and rotate between them. Once you get going, you can set stones nonstop with both accuracy and speed, without fooling with tweezers or the large exposed heating surface of a hotplate. The irons are relatively cheap ($15-25 each) and well worth the investment for what you save in time and trouble.

Using 3 bejeweling irons, i heat-set over 1000 jet-colored crystals in an afternoon on this dress, made for Mariette Hartley in the Huntington Theatre's 1999 production of Mrs. Warren's Profession:



You can buy them from a number of sources, but I have historically purchased my heat-set crystals and setting tools from Creative Crystal. They also offer a product line of heat-set nailheads, which is a speedy and sanity-saving alternative to hand-set studwork, as well as bespoke and custom pattern designs.

January 2017

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 20th, 2026 06:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios