A poll! Props or costumes?
Feb. 13th, 2008 11:10 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
We all know that the dress worn by the lead actress is a costume, whereas the hairbrush she uses while speaking her monologue is a prop. There are some items though which fall into that grey area, sometimes props, sometimes costumes, sometimes...who knows!
Some places i've worked have had very strict regulations ("Props do all handbags, costumes does all masks, no exceptions"), whereas others (such as my current employer) we are open to discuss with the props department various "propstume" responsibilities on a case-by-case basis. This kind of question can also apply to props vs scenery--last summer, a landmark legal decision was handed down in the case of the local stagecraft union vs. the Milwaukee Repertory Theatre, in which a particular trunk built by the props department was in fact considered a prop by the court rather than scenery and thus, not in violation of the union agreement with the theatre.
I'm just curious though, in the realm of "costumes" or "props"--if you work at a theatre, how does your employer classify the following items? And, if you freelance, how do you define them in terms of your bids on jobs? I'd love clarification in comments too if you have any further input, or other things not listed that are in your employer's "grey area" as well!
ETA: Unfortunately, only those with LiveJournal accounts can vote in the poll; a basic account is free to set up, but readers who don't want to mess with that should feel free to comment with your answers and input!
[Poll #1137880]
Some places i've worked have had very strict regulations ("Props do all handbags, costumes does all masks, no exceptions"), whereas others (such as my current employer) we are open to discuss with the props department various "propstume" responsibilities on a case-by-case basis. This kind of question can also apply to props vs scenery--last summer, a landmark legal decision was handed down in the case of the local stagecraft union vs. the Milwaukee Repertory Theatre, in which a particular trunk built by the props department was in fact considered a prop by the court rather than scenery and thus, not in violation of the union agreement with the theatre.
I'm just curious though, in the realm of "costumes" or "props"--if you work at a theatre, how does your employer classify the following items? And, if you freelance, how do you define them in terms of your bids on jobs? I'd love clarification in comments too if you have any further input, or other things not listed that are in your employer's "grey area" as well!
ETA: Unfortunately, only those with LiveJournal accounts can vote in the poll; a basic account is free to set up, but readers who don't want to mess with that should feel free to comment with your answers and input!
[Poll #1137880]
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 05:54 pm (UTC)If the pocketwatch sits atop a set piece, but is never worn by the actor- it is a prop.
If the purse/handbag is worn, it is a costume piece, if it sits somewhere it is a prop.
Marionettes, shadow puppets, etc are props, whereas glove puppets (being worn) are costumes.
So basically- is it worn? If so it's a costume. If it's just held/sits there but isn't worn it's a prop.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 06:17 pm (UTC)Functional pieces were kept by the costume shop, but the props depts could sign them out for productions as needed.
It seemed to make sense. If it was more realistic and wearable, it was kept with costumes. If it was a 5 foot tall rubber pocketwatch, it was in props.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 08:19 pm (UTC)And, though i've never made one of those, i've made a two foot tall pocketwatch worn on an actor's head as a headdress (clearly in that case, it was a costume item!)!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 08:16 pm (UTC)Another thing I've found is that a lot of propsmasters don't necessarily know how to sew, so sometimes it is easier to just take over an item, rather than spending the time coaching the prop folk through it.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 09:52 pm (UTC)I can say, from the contracts I've seen, masks and body puppets have been considered costumes and hand puppets props from a designer contract perspective.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 10:43 pm (UTC)And in most of the theatres I work in the props person is usually happy to have less to worry about.. plus they usually have less of a cohesive "vision" that they are trying to maintain.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 02:18 pm (UTC)Generally, stage management covered anything that could be found in our stores; pocket watches, parasols, fans, etc. If the items needed to be repaired, fabric items went to wardrobe, non-fabric items to props, or both sometimes. Same goes with when an item needed to be made. Puppets, masks, and any special prop makes went to props. It was not unheard of for our school to pair up a prop maker and a wardrobe assistant for crossover work.
There was a lot of crossover with carpentry, scenic art, electrics, and sometimes even rigging. During a panto or opera, somedays you had no clue what department you really worked for.