labricoleuse: (shakespearean alan cumming)
One of the most important first steps in developing historical costumes for stage is to answer the question, How was it originally done?

By doing initial research into historical construction techniques, you can often eliminate many hours of troubleshooting and anticipate engineering issues. If you are lucky enough to have access to an archive of antique and vintage clothing, inspecting primary garments is ideal. Online resources which feature interior shots and structural analysis, such as the CoStar Vintage Clothing Archive, can be a fair substitute. Another means of seeing inside clothes of a past period are primary sources--books, pamphlets, and articles written at the time about sewing, tailoring, millinery, etc.

Luckily, we live in a time when the distribution of knowledge is easier than ever before. People can publish books in small runs with home equipment, or make books with a small circle of interest available through Print On Demand publishers with little or no initial investment. Anyone who can get themselves to a public library can publish a blog just like this one. If you can read and write, you can make your words available to the world.

Before the advent of internet publishing, blogs, POD printers and the like, the primary source of reprinted period sources for costumers was Dover Publications, and they are still a valuable, wonderful source for many indispensable research titles. Dover's publications are affordably-priced, printed in trade-paperback format with glossy cardstock covers. Here are a couple of examples of their titles:

Mary Thomas' Book of Knitting Patterns. This reference, first published in the 1930s, is a compendium of knitting patterns--not projects themselves, per se, but instructions on creating different effects such as cable-knit. Thomas illustrates how to do dozens and dozens of effects by which an intuitive knitter might create her or his own garment patterns.

Old-Fashioned Ribbon Art: Ideas and Designs for Accessories and Decorations. This is a reprint of what might be considered the 1920s equivalent of a fashion zine for DIY-ers. It's short, only 32 pages (under $5 from Dover so it's no huge investment of cash), but contains amazing illustrations and instructions for creating cockades, ribbon flowers, ornaments, and accessories. Not only is it useful for 1920s period embellishments, but also for previous periods in which cockades were frequently used in mens millinery (think Napoleonic France, for example).

In fact, i attribute my own early interest in costuming to the resources of Dover Publications. Each year, my parents would receive their mail-order catalogue, and i was encouraged from a young age to pore over it with a highlighter, picking out books that i might want for Christmas. As a girl, i particularly loved their intricately-illustrated coloring books on fascinating subjects like Greek myths, or the history of the locomotive, and their paperdolls of ancient royalty and foreign cultures. Later on as a poor college student, i loved Dover for their Thrift Editions, simple paperbacks of classic novels and plays which they sell for $1 or $2.

Peruse their website--i guarantee you'll find tons of great books!



I also want to mention a couple of less widely-known publishers of vintage reprints, the first of whom is R. L. Shep Publications. R. L. Shep is hardly a new publisher, having been around since 1962; the internet just makes his books easier to find and purchase. Some highlight titles from this publisher:

The Blue Book of Men's Tailoring by Frederick Croonborg, 1907. You'll find well-worn editions of this book passed down through tailoring families, often rebound several times over. In fact, one of our recent graduate program applicants brought her father's copy to share with us in her portfolio presentation, which she'd used as a source text to create several tailored jackets. Now you can get a new copy from R. L. Shep for $30.

Late Victorian Women's Tailoring: The Direct System of Ladies' Cutting by T. H. Holding, 1897. In addition to Holding's tailoring system, the book includes instructional sections on manufacturing trimwork, undergarments, and accessories. $20.

Ladies Self-Instructor in Millinery and Mantua Making, Embroidery and Applique, 1853. A sort of overview of period embellishment arts and parlor-business accessory construction. Contains an extra section of illustrations from Godey's Lady's Book. $16.

And, R. L. Shep is the primary republisher of Mme. Anna Ben-Yusuf's 1909 book, Edwardian Hats: The Art of Millinery, which can be purchased for $25. [1]

In addition to their own titles, R. L. Shep Publications also produces a small-circulation catalogue of rare, out-of-print books that they acquire, called Books on Cloth, distributed and maintained by Fred Struthers. A single copy is only $2.50, and you never know what gems you might find listed in its pages!


Another company from whom i recently purchased a couple of titles is Iva Rose Vintage Reproductions. They produce mainly knitting, crocheting, and tatting pattern books, many of which were originally printed by yarn, thread, and pattern companies like Bucilla, Butterick, Paton's, etc. They also produce millinery and toymaking publications. I was so pleased with the service and quality of their product, i had to share it here on La Bricoleuse

The company is named for the founder's grandmother, who sounds like she was an inspiring woman of the early 20th century with an interest both in handwork arts and in education. You can read about her life and tragic untimely death from breast cancer, as well as view an array of wonderful photographs of Iva Rose here. As such, it seems that her granddaughter's mission in founding the company was to preserve techniques and resources pertaining to ladies period handwork, and foster a spirit of self-education in continuation of her grandmother's legacy.

The company's website allows you to search by decade, which is a nice feature for historian-research purposes. The two books i purchased were the 1903 publication, Paton's Collection of Knitting and Crochet Receipts #3 by M. Elliot Scrivenor, and Scientific Hat Finishing and Renovating, by Henry L. Ermatinger.

The 1903 knitting book (which was originally published by Paton's and sold for a shilling) is full of excellent patterns for a range of period knitwear for men, women, and children. I'm particularly interested in the knitted waistcoats, petticoats, ladies' stockings, gloves/mittens/muffatees [2], and hoods/caps/fascinators. There's a garment section called the hug-me-tight, which is something like a surplice bolero vest, and for which there's a pattern in the modern book i recently bought, Lion Brand Yarn Vintage Styles for Today. I plan on knitting the Lion version and the Paton's period version both, so once i'm finished with that (probably in like 2 years' time!) i'll make a comparative post. Unrelated to content, this book has a beautifully-rendered full-color cover image of two ladies and a girl knitting and crocheting, depicted in the Art Nouveau style.

The Ermatinger book is a 1919 reference on men's hats, a subject upon which you can rarely find any information. The production and refurbishment of men's hats was historically--much like men's tailoring--a largely oral historical tradition, passed on mostly through the trade tradition of apprenticeship. Books are hard to come by. If you click on the title up there though, there are on the Iva Rose site a number of reproduced illustrations from the book, by which you can see its indispensable usefulness for a theatrical crafts artisan such as myself, or indeed anyone who might often have to repair, alter, clean, and build men's headwear. And for a mere $20? Who can resist? Not I.

Incidentally, Iva Rose produces their own reprints of the Ben-Yusuf text and the 1926 Georgina Kerr Kaye book, Millinery for Every Woman. Iva Rose's edition of the Ben Yusuf text is $5 cheaper than the R. L. Shep edition and retains the original Nouveau cover image of roses, but the Shep edition contains an insert of catalogue pages from the 1908-09 fashion publication Correct Dress.

Given the choice, i would purchase an instructional book from Iva Rose over a book from other repro publishers, because i prefer their use of a spiral-spine binding. With instructional trade books, the spiral binding means the book will lay open flat of its own accord on a work table; when one has both hands involved in stitching or knitting or similar, that's a great convenience. The books are produced in a high-quality workbook format, with a sturdy opaque black plastic back cover and a clear plastic overlay to protect the full-color front cover. I suppose you could argue that this sort of format results in a book that looks like it was run off at the copy department of an Office Max or whatever, but for my money, the information contained within is just as valuable whether it's hardbound, paperbound, or ringbound, and for my purposes, ringbound is the most handy. My favorite edition of the milliner's standby reference, From the Neck Up: An Illustrated Guide to Hatmaking, is a ringbound version produced in the 1990s--hatmaking is a two-handed craft and i like that the book stays open of its own accord.


So, anyone else want to add some sources here? Got a favorite reproduction publisher, or do you publish your own reproduction resource texts? Favorite old titles? Or, if you've had a bad experience ordering and want to warn others, please comment! As always, i welcome your input. One of my favorite aspects of the blog format is that it fosters discussion, and allows all readers an equal voice--it's not just me pontificating on a street corner, as it were.


[1] Incidentally, for those interested in the ongoing saga of my research into her life, my speculations have been cleared up by historian, archivist, and the Ben-Yusufs' (forthcoming) biographer, Frank Goodyear of the National Portrait Gallery at the Smithsonian. He confirmed that Mme. Anna was in fact the mother of Zaida Ben-Yusuf, and that both women were successful milliners who wrote extensively on the craft (in addition to any number of other pursuits). His interest and study on the two women stems from Zaida's photographic portraiture career rather than her contributions to the millinery arts, but it was exciting to talk with someone who could answer my biographical questions about these two amazing artists and artisans. Mr. Goodyear confirmed that a retrospective exhibit of Zaida Ben-Yusuf's portraiture and other photography will be mounted at the NPG in early 2008, and will coincide with the publication of his own biographical work on the lives of the Ben-Yusuf women. I'll be metaphorically first in line, both to see the exhibit and read Mr. Goodyear's book!

[2] Vocab: muffatees--knit tubes of fabric for the wrists, recently repopularized by teen girls and 20-something women under the name "armwarmers." Me, i like "muffatees" better than "armwarmers"!
labricoleuse: (Default)
The craftwork class i'm teaching this semester is a fairly broad introduction to millinery--it's challenging, in that it is aimed at production graduate students and presumes that those enrolled have advanced/couture sewing skills, but it also is designed for students who have had minimal or no hat-making experience. [livejournal.com profile] unluckymonkey asked me for recommendations on hatmaking info sources (specifically for felt hats), and that spurred me to make a post similar to the one a while back on my shoe class bibliography.


For the first unit, an overview of buckram hat form construction, i have the students read Tim Dial's book, Basic Millinery for the Stage. (It's a short book, so that goes quick.) It's a concise, straightforward overview of Mr. Dial's methods for stageworthy hatmaking, and if you've never made a hat or looked inside the "guts" of one, it's probably the best place to start. It's got photographs and diagrams to help elaborate on the text and is written in an easy-to-understand manner. If your interest in hatmaking is not for stage performance, bear in mind that Dial's book is aimed toward that--his techniques focus on speeding up production time and maximizing the durability of the hats. Stage millinery is slightly different from traditional millinery, in that traditional millinery employs meticulous handwork--often in a theatre milliner's construction, we'll substitute machine-stitching where possible in the interest of time-saving and durability.


The other required text for the course is Denise Dreher's From the Neck Up: An Illustrated Guide to Hatmaking. This book is much more in-depth than the Dial book and features an appendix with miniaturized pattern shapes for a variety of historical hat shapes. (I've found that, though you can scale these up and use them as patterns, they don't always scale up perfectly and are better viewed as guidelines for the shapes you're looking to make than hard-and-fast accurate patterns.) In addition to being an accomplished milliner for stage and film, Dreher has an extensive background in the study of millinery history so the book includes a lot of interesting information on hatmaking techniques of the past--for example, she discusses willow, a material once often used in millinery but which is (to my knowledge) no longer produced. I found three sheets of willow in our storage (presumably from some bygone donation of millinery supplies), so the information on working with it will come in handy for me very soon. This historical aspect of the book is also of particular interest to milliners who might be refurbishing vintage or antique hats, and who might come across techniques or materials in the interior with which they are unfamiliar.


A book that you'll find in many workshop libraries, but which i personally don't care for, is Classic Millinery Techniques: A Complete Guide to Making and Designing Today's Hats, by Ann Albrizio and Osnat Lustig, and by "today's hats" they mean "hats of the late 1980s and early 1990s," as the book was published in 1998. It includes a lot of color photography and the sections on trim and feathers are helpful (particularly the photo-map showing the various types of feathers, which can be a great resource when ordering feathers sight-unseen from a feather dealer, to make sure you order the right types), but it's specifically aimed toward those wishing to pursue millinery from a contemporary fashion design perspective and thus, for theatrical purposes, contains a lot of superfluous information. Additionally, it contains several errors--such as the mislabeling of a photo which erroneously illustrates the difference between millinery grosgrain and grosgrain ribbon--that can be confusing to the novice milliner.

The book also works my nerves with respect to my major pet peeve, flippancy about artisan safety. While i recognize that safety education is sorely lacking in most trade fields and that nearly all reference materials for topics like millinery have some poor advice or omissions about protecting one's self from hazardous chemicals, it really jerks my chain when modern references are practically dismissive about such things--this book contains attempts at drollery in this vein, such as advising the reader to use chemicals that potentially pose respiratory hazards, then adding a parenthetical afterthought like "(Did you remember to open a window?)" Are you kidding me?

I know it's a nerdy-safety-goggley thing, but i truly believe that educators and experts do newcomers to the field a vast disservice by omitting serious discussion of worker safety. It's an oft-trotted-out trade workhorse to note that the phrase, "mad as a hatter," came from early milliners burning out their brain cells working with mercury-based felt sizing chemicals, but it's so oft trotted-out because it's a point of import that cannot be stressed enough: the onus is on the artisan to be vigilant, informed, and cautious about hazards in the workplace. Don't just "open a window, ha-ha," when working with solvent-based chemicals--get yourself a fit-tested mo-effen respirator with the right freaking cartridges and use it, please. Otherwise, well, enjoy your dalliance on that primrose path, but mark my words, that's the road to uncontrollable tremors and three-headed babies and such. There's a prevailing misconception that, because nobody's chained to their sewing machine in a burning shirtwaist factory, and because organizations like OSHA exist and laws are out there on the books, somehow we all live and work in safe environments. We don't, so be alert and tune up your BS-meter when reading reference books that don't adequately address precautionary safety measures. Costuming is fun, but it's a surprisingly dangerous job.

Wow, i think that's the first rant in this blog. Whoops! I try to keep it even-keeled and professional here, but this particular subject really gets me het-up. So...uh, back to your regularly-scheduled book review...



One book that's not useful for technique instruction but is indispensible as a reference for period shapes, research, and inspiration is Susan Langley's Vintage Hats and Bonnets 1770-1970: Identification and Values. It's written for a readership of collectors and dealers in vintage and antique millinery, but it's amazing for theatrical and historical costumers as well. It's divided into chapters by decade, each one beginning with a brief overview of what was going on at the time in fashion and the world in general, followed by pages of photographs and illustrations: period photos, modern photos of surviving period hats, catalogue illustrations, fashion magazine pictures from the time, all kinds of great stuff! My ongoing coal-scuttle bonnet project comes from a resource image in this book.


I also have a number of reprinted period sources in my shop's reference library, of which i'll mention two that are fairly easily obtainable. The first is Millinery for Every Woman, by Georgina Kerr Kaye. The original was published in 1926, but it's been reprinted by Lacis. Of particular use in my class has been the sections on working with velvet as a cover fabric and the extensive chapter at the end on creating garniture shapes from fabric and ribbon.

(Vocab: garniture, noun - an ornamental piece of decor on a hat or garment. Feel free to use this term where you otherwise might use words like "thingamajiggy" or "whatchamacallit" or "doohickey." I found it in a 1920s magazine article on making cockades for cloches and dropped-waist dresses that need an ornamental focal-point and i love it. GARNITURE, a word i have been looking for to no avail for ages!)


Another book we've perused for period shaping and draping techniques is Edwardian Hats: The Art of Millinery, by Mme. Anna Ben-Yusuf, first published in 1909. A good reference source, but also quite fascinating from an anthropological perspective--millinery being one of the trades a woman could respectably earn a living at in the period, the book also features some business advice on how one might run a successful milliner's shop from one's parlor, including information on bookkeeping, business costs, and market trends in hat fashion at the time. The book also includes some catalogue illustrations at the beginning from a publication called Correct Dress: Fall & Winter 1908-09 Cool stuff, if that interests you!

(Incidentally, i am dying to know more about Mme. Ben-Yusuf; all i know is that she was a millinery instructor at the Pratt Institute in Brooklyn, NYC at the turn of the century, and in addition to writing this book, she contributed a number of articles and columns to trade journals on hatmaking. I suspect that she was related somehow to the reknowned portrait photographer of the period, Zaida Ben-Yusuf, who maintained a studio in New York for a brief time in the 1890s-1900s. Her surname implies that she and/or her husband were of Arabic descent, but the trade moniker of "Madame Anna" suggests a European connection as well. A French mode of address ("madame") was common in the millinery trade, whether one had any French background or not, to give a fashionable "Parisienne" impression of the milliner to her clients, and "Anna" could be anything from Russian to Greek to Hebrew to Catalan, who knows. The prospect of, speculatively, two women, Anna and Zaida, sisters-in-law, immigrants, both making their living as reknowned and successful artists and artisans in Edwardian New York! Fascinating! Someone write me that as a novel, please. Or perhaps i should get typing and do it myself. Ha! Wow, i digress. You see though why at one point i thought i wanted a PhD in costume history.)


Again with the nerdy-safety-goggley warning: as with any period reference, there are some truly disturbing portions of these books--i had a grim laugh at the section on using gasoline to treat feathers and hat bases--so use your judgment when consulting them for practical advice on technique. Imagine: a millinery studio lit by gaslight, with milliners using gasoline in open containers... Egad.


[livejournal.com profile] unluckymonkey asked specifically for online resources, so here are a couple of links:

For an excellent glossary on hatmaking terminology and a wonderfully in-depth sidebar of links on all aspects of millinery, check out Hats UK. It's a website run by the British trade publication The Hat Magazine, and has a forum section for discussions and advice queries as well.

The Village Hat Shop has a wonderful page with links to photos depicting a wide range of millinery subjects, including blocking felt hats, designing hats, dyeing hats, etc.


In a related note, I'm excited that a recent La Bricoleuse article on straw hat rejuvenation got recommended on the Hartford York Hats blog! Dunno how they found me, but i appreciate the shout-out!



Got a favorite hat book, periodical, or website link? Please comment!



Oh, and! Not entirely unrelated, because there's a chapter on hat patterns in it, but i wanted to mention a book i recently bought and am super-excited about: Lion Brand Yarn Vintage Styles for Today: More Than 50 Patterns to Knit and Crochet. Each pattern is introduced with a period photograph or illustration depicting the garment worked and worn by a historically-contemporary model, then a modern photograph of the piece made with modern yarn and worn by a modern model. It's super cool to see, say, a grainy old tintype of a woman sporting a knit cardigan, then that same cardigan worked up today! I have obtained the yarn for my first project from this book--a cap-sleeve shrug taken from a 1950s original. One caution though: these are not exact reproductions of the original garments and won't result in finished products that will necessarily stand up to "period Nazi" critiquing. They've been modified to take into account modern undergarments and are intended to result in pieces that can be worn currently without period underpinnings like corsetry and such. I do think that from a crafts artisanship perspective, if you needed to create a period piece for a production, one could work backwards from the archival photographs using the patterns as a guide and recreate the antique garment with deductive modifications.

I guess my project of creating knitted spatterdashes (in which i did exactly that, work backward from a photo reference) had its intended effect: namely, getting me excited about expanding my skill at knitwork and crochet!
labricoleuse: (shoes!)
See, normally, i teach four classes on rotation in crafts artisanship topics--dyeing/painting, millinery, masks/SFX, and bricolage (essentially an "everything else" class that covers jewelry, parasols, gloves, body padding, macropuppets, etc)--which our MFA students take during their first two years of study.

This semester though, in addition to the normal millinery class, i am teaching two students a specialized seminar, an advanced graduate level course in shoe and boot construction. We are covering a range of shoe-related topics--repairs, alterations, building from scratch, and "fantasy"/SFX footwear. Our first shoe project (simple leather shoes) should be finished soon so photos and methods on that will be forthcoming; I did poulaines (pointy-toed shoes) for my example and my students did Irish Ghillies and a 19th c. men's boots. First though, i thought i'd post about what books we are using for the class.

Our required text is How to Make Your Own Shoes by Mary Wales Loomis. Loomis is a self-taught shoemaker whose self-published book is a great, thorough, introductory resource and a good reference for methods on making a custom last from a foot cast, and various pump-style ladies shoes from a wide range of materials. Loomis' website has a fair amount of information even without the book itself.

In addition, we are also using and studying the following resources:

Foxfire 6 (1980). Contains an article on shoemaking, which is more of a historical perspective article, 'how they did it in the old days'-type of thing, but useful to know, particularly since most shops have limited cordwaining machinery.

The Mode in Footwear by R. Turner Wilcox. Back in the 1940s, Wilcox did a whole series of "The Mode In [...]" reference books, all of which are out of print now. You'll find them in libraries though and xeroxes from them pop up all the time in costume designers' research. The footwear title presents dozens of styles by time period and country of origin, and often includes little details about materials used in construction and the like.

Shoes and Pattens by Francis Grew, et al. This is an incredible resource on medieval footwear, put out by the Museum of London. Detailed information about the 2000+ medieval shoes discovered on the bank of the Thames.

Shoes, by June Swann. This is one of any number of good books and day-planners and photo calendars and the like out there on the market that are full of inspirational images of creative footwear, both antique and modern.

Page-a-Day Shoes Gallery Calendar. Another resource we're using largely for inspiration and research imagery.

The Pattern-Cutter's Handbook by Michael H. Sharp. This book is a drafting resource for how to make various upper shapes.

Vass, Laszlo & Magda Molnar, Handmade Shoes for Men. This book is an amazingly thorough resource on all aspects of the cordwainer and cobbler trades, full of many excellent visual resources, from photographs to pattern diagrams to historical engravings and artwork. Includes an overview of nine workshops around the world and a useful glossary of terms.

The Woodstock Craftsman's Manual, Vol. 2. Contains a chapter on handmade sandals. This is clearly an old self-published small print run book from the early 1970s. I found it in a used bookshop, no idea how difficult it would be to track down.

The Forgotten Arts, by John Seymour. Contains a chapter on carving/sculpting wooden shoe soles.


Websites of interest, pertaining to professional shoemaking:

Shoe Trades Publications site: http://www.shoetrades.com/
The Honorable Cordwainers Company: http://www.thehcc.org/


And, the following websites are indispensable for information about building illusion footwear--claws, hooves, paws, etc--but may not be work-safe, as they are all written and maintained by fetishists:

Great resource for construction options for paws/claws; very detailed and helpful: http://www.fursuit.org/faq/

Great overview of construction options for paws/claws: http://www.nicodemus.org/fursuit/paws.php

Detailed instructions for making hoof-shoes and boots: http://www.pets-de.org/lib/others/boots/hoofall.html

Step-by-step tutorial for making hoof-shoes and boots: http://www.stripedsmiles.com/CostFootGear.html


Hopefully some of this is useful, and if you find any of these OOP books for cheap, snap them up! Additionally, if you are looking for someone to custom-make you a pair of shoes, check out El Diablo Shoes in Holyoke, MA, or any of the shoemakers mentioned in this article: http://www.stage-directions.com/backissues/sept03/footnotes.shtml
labricoleuse: (shakespearean alan cumming)
If you haven't heard about Michael Bourne's ballet reimagining of Tim Burton's film Edward Scissorhands...well, i guess you just did. It's running in Charlotte, NC, through Jan 10th, and then goes on to nine more North American cities over the next four months--Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, DC, St. Louis, Brooklyn, Toronto, St. Paul, Denver, & Seattle. (Sorry, if you live in SF or LA, you already missed it.)

In addition to being a fan of Tim Burton's work and the film version of Edward Scissorhands, this production held particular interest for me professionally: a ballet, essentially, all about a work of costume craft artisanship--the very nature of the main character and the entire story depend upon Edward's hands being made from scissor-blades.

First, here are some stills and video from the production for reference: Read more... )
labricoleuse: (ass head mask)
Last Saturday at the Forest Theatre in Chapel Hill, a 20-foot Buddha puppet walked through the beyond-sold-out-capacity crowd and didn’t squish a single theatergoer. Paperhand Puppet Intervention performed their four-part puppet-play, "As the Crow Flies," and your correspondent, luckily, was there.

The show opened with. . .

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
All photos courtesy of Danielle Latman & Michael Habib

...a dramatization of the legend of John Henry... )
labricoleuse: (shakespearean alan cumming)
In the balcony-level lobby of the USF's Randall Theatre there is a small exhibit of masks from the Festival's costume collection. The masks are from past productions, and are exhibited on headforms with small placards detailing which production, what year the piece was made, and of what materials. The headforms are suspended on long gold hooks attached to the wall opposite a bank of large windows. I believe this exhibit will be on display for the duration of both the summer and fall seasons (2006).

I photographed most of the pieces on display.

five photographs with commentary )
labricoleuse: (ass head mask)
"Face to Face" is a retrospective gallery show currently running through August 31st at the Carrboro Artcenter in Carrboro, NC. The exhibit features masks and puppets from the productions of the Paperhand Puppet Intervention, a Triangle-based performance collective headed by activist-artists Donovan Zimmerman and Jan Burger.

An excerpt from their mission statement:

Paperhand Puppet intervention is dedicated to bringing many styles of puppetry and artistic expression to the Triangle area and the world.

These styles include: Giant puppets, masks, stilt dancing, rod puppets, shadows or silhouettes, and anything else we might make at any time.

Our vision is inspired by our love for the earth and its creatures (including humans) as well as our belief in justice, equality, and peace.


The exhibit is free to the public and displayed in the main hall of the Carrboro Artcenter. Masks are displayed in a couple of different ways--some of the full-head masks sit atop pedestals in the middle of the room, while others are hung on the walls. The puppets on display range in size from small handpuppets to enormous multiple-puppeteer macropuppets suspended from the ceiling or hung across enormous expanses of wallspace. There are no barriers between audience and artwork, so you can get right up close to the puppets and masks and really look at how they were made. Most all appeared to be made with a mache surface sealed and painted with acrylics.

Unfortunately when i went to the gallery, there was a birthday party of small children in the adjacent space whose boisterous enthusiasm made it difficult to concentrate on the artwork, and the gallery smelled of pee where a couple of little kids had not made it to the restrooms in time. Neither kept me from appreciating the exhibit, but i'll probably go back again later where i can check everything out a second time minus the screaming, giggling, and pee-smelling.

If you go, you'll see things like this... )

Seeing this exhibit made me even more excited about the upcoming puppetry convention, of which Paperhand is one of the sponsors and primary "host company." I can't wait to see their production, As the Crow Flies...and of course, write all about it here.
labricoleuse: (shoes!)
Cirque de Soleil's , currently running at the MGM Grand Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, NV, is so mindbendingly spectacular that merely witnessing it will make drunk people sober, even if you've been sucking down free drinks at the rate of three per hour down at the Elvis slots since noon...which, admittedly i had been, so I can tell you that from personal experience.

Ever seen a Cirque show? If not, it's like, flying exotic dancers from another planet doing circus tricks on Broadway in a vague sort of Commedia paradigm, while stuff blows up and fire shoots everywhere. Except better. I found myself clapping my hands with glee, gasping in surprise, even weeping like a little girl as i watched this show, the majority of which takes place on a vertical stage set at a right-angle to the audience.

But, most folks know Cirque performances are fantastic and fantastical; this blog is about the costumes.

From the Costume Design section of the presskit:

Marie-Chantale Vaillancourt's costumes for are quite a departure from what audiences have come to expect from Cirque du Soleil . In this show there are no neon-bright primary colours on display, no candy stripes or optical-illusion patterns. No shimmering skin-tight bodysuits either. And yet, 's costumes are among the richest and most eye-catching ever seen in a Cirque production. Vaillancourt comes from the world of theatre and film, and it shows.

"We didn't set out to break completely from past Cirque productions," says Vaillancourt. "And actually, it was important that there should be a continuity. However, the fact that I've worked with Robert Lepage since 1989 means that he and I have developed a kind of private language and we found that we couldn’t break with our own past. And at the same time, we did want to bring a breath of fresh air to Cirque."


And who doesn't want to see photographs...? )
labricoleuse: (vintage hair)
[Reviews are written from the particular perspective of a costume crafts artisan, and thus focus largely on technical and aesthetic aspects of costume craft items and properties.]

It's been a while since i've posted--my contract ended at Utah Shakes and I've had to make my way back easterly (by way of a quick dogleg over to Las Vegas) and get resettled back into life out here in North Carolina. While in Vegas i got to go see Cirque de Soleil's Ka, and a review of that is forthcoming, as soon as i figure out exactly how to handle posting imagery from the show without, you know, getting my trou sued off. Expect to read that within the week, since i don't start back up at the theatre for another week.

But, I open with a digression. The point was to write about Anglo-Mania, the mind-blowingly brilliantly-composed exhibit which the Costume Institute has running at the Met through September 4, 2006.

I had heard about this exhibit from some friends who'd been to see it (rave reviews) and had the good fortune to be in New York this past weekend (strictly unprofessional reasons--i was there to see Lucero play a booze-cruise show on a sail around Manhattan), so i had to go check it out.

The Met in and of itself is always just a little overwhelming to me--I know I could spend a whole week in there and still not see everything. I remember as a kid loving that E. L. Konigsburg novel, From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler, and fantasizing about running away like those kids in that book and living in the Met. Just know that i am forcing myself to stay on-topic here, and write only about this Costume Institute exhibit, and not the 293874234 other things that are mind-blowingly excellent at the Met (such as the staggering Kara Walker exhibit, "Deluge,", which closed yesterday).

From the intro paragraph emblazoned on the wall outside the exhibit: Through the lens of fashion, "AngloMania" examines aspects of English culture that have fueled the European and American imagination, such as class, sport, royalty, pageantry, eccentricity, the English gentleman, and the English country garden. [...] Traditionally, the presentation of costume in period rooms follows strict formal and chronological guidelines. "AngloMania" upends and disrupts these guidelines, merging the old with the new, sometimes in a single outfit, to reveal a conceptual continuum of ideas of Englishness.

As you approach the galleries where AngloMania is installed, you see a large archway, flanked by mannequins cast in a milky-translucent resin. These mannequins are cartoonishly punk--enormous technicolor mohawks and gafftape and torn Union Jacks and clompy Doc Martens. I admit, i got my snob on right off the bat, being overly critical of the admittedly-poor distressing job on the clearly-brand-new gently-scuffed boots...but, that was quickly dispelled by the very first installation: a mannequin, his safety-orange rocker-wig dunked in acrylic medium and sculpted to look like he was standing in a high wind, staring into a gilt ornamentally-framed 17th-century mirror. The mannequin was clad in a frock coat of David Bowie's, made from Union Jack fabric, distressed with burns and rips and in one place something that...well, appeared to be ejaculate. I set off the alarm accidentally by energetically pointing out this particular stain to my companion. Oops.

The second room is the English Garden, which is in fact a delapidated, poorly-lit grim parlor hung with swags of rotted-looking curtains across windows behind which is projected the looped film and sounds of a drenching rainstorm. The models in this room were all female mannequins in 18th-century mantuas and robes a l'anglaise made from Spitalfields silk brocades. The women wear on their heads Philip Treacy hats shaped and dyed to look like enormous vaginal-shaped orchid blossoms. They are all posed as if they are listlessly wandering around a central figure, clad in a tulle dress by Hussein Chalayan, created by the attachment of thousands of tulle rosettes to a conical-shaped understructure and then trimmed and shaped like a topiary.

I was remarking to my friend that the garden room reminded me of the general production-design aesthetic deployed in The Libertine (you know, the grim Rochester costume-drama in which Johnny Depp's nose rots off), when we entered the next room, entitled "Upstairs/Downstairs"--servant figures juxtaposed with nobility figures--and there on the wall was the original famous portrait of the Earl of Rochester himself, with his capering monkey. Ha! The two "maids" were clad in Chalayan ensembles that looked to be remade/cobbled-together vintage collage-dresses, while the two nobles wore a silk velvet and marquesite court suit and a satin and voided-velvet Worth gown trimmed in ostrich feathers and rhinestones. A manservant stood by in 19th-c. livery, which of course looks like extremely absurd and overtrimmed 18th-c. menswear.

The next room was called "The Hunt," and featured hunting- and riding-inspired ensembles on mannequins astride horse-mannequins, accompanied by dog-mannequins. I have to say, this room was somewhat boring compared to everything else, the only truly remarkable piece being a dusty-purple gown loosely based on a riding habit by Vivian Westwood. The fabric was woven so that it alternated matte and shiny satin stripes, and the entire skirt was caught up in the front to show the wearer's legs as she sat sidesaddle. A guy-mannequin in newsprint-screened stretchpants and a Galliano jockstrap was somewhat amusing as well.

Through an archway and into the next room, we were metaphorically punched in the teeth by the display entitled "The Deathbed." In this room a male mannequin lay in an enormous ornately-canopied 17th-c. bed, clad in a red tartan ensemble and something resembling a gimp-mask with an enormous cast-aluminum "jawbone" along the lower portion of it. A death-figure stood at the foot of the bed in a black glitter-encrusted stiff canvas gown, her torso encased in a cast-aluminum item described in the program as "Spine Corset." And yep, that's pretty much what it was--rib-like spidery bone-limbs that encircled her torso with an enormous vertebral spine running up the back, all brightly shining metal. Oh, and a pair of Manolo Blahniks. Two mannequins were positioned as "mourners," one in a black silk gown of Queen Victoria's and the other in a mesh and taffeta distressed crazy Alexander McQueen creation.

To either side of this room were tiny alcoves which together formed an installation called "Empire and Monarchy," both containing single mannequins wearing Vivian Westwood gowns--one inspired by a painting of Queen Elizabeth I and the other by a photograph of Queen Elizabeth II. The most interesting thing about these was the silver-wire choker on the QEI mannequin, which had set into it instead of oblong jewels these glass vials full of dubious-looking liquid. A perusal of the info card revealed that the necklace contained urine and semen.

Then another single-mannequin pair of installations entitled "Francomania," the first of which ("Tradition") contained a mannequin in that iconic Worth dress of white silk satin with the black silk voided velvet patterned like some kind of wrought-iron fencework. The other part of this section, "Transgression," was somehow even more holy-crappish than the "Deathbed" tableau. It featured a single female mannequin in an enormously-trained and -bustled black silk taffeta Galliano/Dior gown, clearly patterned after mourning dresses with all the ruched ribbon applique and the like. The mannequin's hand was outstretched and a huge crow perched on her arm. On her head was a black feathered hood completely covering her face, with a thin beak hooking out from it like some kind of Punchinello nose. She was surrounded by antique porcelain figurines of birds, and from behind the false windows came the raucous sounds of a murder of crows cawing.

The next room was an enormous space entitled "The Gentleman's Club." It was divided into two parts: "Tradition: The Gentleman" and "Transgression: The Dandy and the Punk." These were all mishmashed together such that you had a few clusters of men in worsted suits posing around humidors and valet cases and the like, right beside a trainwreck of mohawked punks in smoking jackets and those McLaren t-shirts with the gay cowboys and the defaced Queen and the like. The mannequins' mohawks were made from all kinds of strange objects: tampons and cigarettes and Barbie legs arranged on felt bases in fin shapes. The best part about this room was the juxtaposition of a white-tie evening suit formerly belonging to the Duke of Windsor, beside a torn plaid coat once owned by Johnny Rotten of the Sex Pistols.

The final room was called "The Hunt Ball," in which mannequins appeared to be waltzing together, the men in 1970s hunting ensembles and the women in modern haute couture gowns based on late 19th-c. silhouettes--silk satins and brocades and froths of striped organdies, bustles and petticoats, Galliano and Westwood and McQueen, with ladies tricornes by Stephen Jones and uncredited but artfully-done enormous Madame de Pompadour-style wigs in cotton-candy colors.

Giddy from the prospect of poor stitchers and cutters dealing with all that stripe-matching on the skirt panels of the gowns, we sailed through the double doors into...some random room full of dishes and crap and a sign that said High Tea was available in the cafe for those wishing to prolong their AngloMania experience. This, i think, was my main criticism of the exhibit in fact--for something so creatively conceived and put-together and executed, so clearly artistically planned, not much thought was lent to the egress. No warning, no enormous over-the-top here's-the-end summary piece de resistance. It was like being at a completely-nuts stage-diving beer-throwing mosh-pit of a rock show, and right as the band is really getting going on a roll of awesome songs and energy and danger, someone cuts off all the sound and says, "Ok folks, that's it, clear out."

All in all, though, if you can possibly get to NYC to see this exhibit, do so. The hats and wigs alone would be worth it, but all blendered together in this rich soupy goulash of OMG, it'd be a bargain at twice-admission.
labricoleuse: (shakespearean alan cumming)
[Reviews of performances are written from the particular perspective of a costume crafts artisan, and thus focus largely on technical and aesthetic aspects of costume craft items and properties.]

John Murray's and Allen Boretz's play Room Service, written in 1937, is what's typically referred to as either a "screwball comedy" or a "zany farce"--the script is full of broad physical comedy, lots of intricate plot-based gags and a breakneck pace driven by nonstop manic action with little or no character development. It's one of the two non-Shakespeare play offerings in this summer's Festival season.

Essentially, the plot can be summed up thus: a destitute company of theatre folk attempt to hoodwink the staff of a fine NYC hotel into underwriting their play, which they believe will be Broadway's next smash-hit. The characters are all broad caricatures--the naive playwright from the country, the conniving producer, the crafty bombshell, the eccentric director, the bumbling hotel manager--and the scheming bullshittery of dialogue flies by so fast you don't have time to consider whether these are realistic or sympathetic characters, you only have time to laugh. It's no surprise that this script was optioned by Hollywood as a vehicle for Groucho Marx.

If you dig that sort of thing, USF's production is a great show, no doubt about it.

I found it entertaining enough--a fine way to spend a hot afternoon, in a velvet-upholstered seat amidst air-conditioned comfort--but what really caught my interest wasn't the play itself; it was the props, set-dressing, and craft pieces. The artistic staff on this production elected to do it as a period piece in late 1930s style.

The entire show takes place over a period of 5 days in the same hotel suite, a room in the posh White Way Hotel, located above the White Way Theatre on Broadway. The set is a triumph of Deco aesthetics, from the matched antique bedroom set (purchased at a junk shop in Salt Lake, i gather), to the ubiquitous stencil motifs on all the doors, to the hand-screened 7-color wallpaper, the entire design executed in a period color palette of aquamarine, rust, gold, and blond wood veneer. Through the various doors we catch glimpses of the hotel halls (broadly stenciled as well in wine and cream) and the bathroom (period fixtures and painted with a Deco tile effect in greens and cream). Above the faux molding around the top of the "room" is a stylized cutout of the NY skyline and the very tip of the HOTEL sign itself, lit up occasionally. This photo has a fairly good view of the period leaping-stag motif wallpaper and stenciled doors.

From a costuming perspective, the most fascinating thing about this show for me was all the period mens undergarments. (Believe me, it's purely professional--all the men strip off to their skivvies at least once in the show, but none of them are really anyone i'd care to view in drawers-only mode outside the realm of theatrical performance.) If you're a fan of various styles of sock garters, buttflapped onesies for adult men, henleys, wifebeaters, and yoked boxers, this is the show for you. There's even a bright pink union suit.

Unfortunately for me, i'm not particularly into the style of women's hats in the show (wide brim, very shallow crown), though there's a sight-gag costume of a glitzed-up "Betsy Ross" (calf-length trumpet skirt and matching bodice in blue satin with huge glittery silver stars all over it, trimmed in red sparkle-organza circle-ruffles dotted in red rhinestones) with an adorably-rendered cocktail mobcap. Yes, that says cocktail mobcap, and i'm totally not BS-ing you.

There are two pairs of shoes worth mentioning from a crafter's perspective as well. The first is some red-and-white spectator pumps that were hand-painted by craft artisan Kyle Schellinger using Tarrago Acrylic Shoe Dye. And yes, "acrylic dye" doesn't make much sense to me either, but so be it. It's what they use here and claim has more sticktuitiveness than typical Magix shoe sprays or Angelus paints. Anyhow, the point of the spectators is just that--they aren't actual spectators! It's just an illusion! But damn, do they look good from the 4th row where i was sitting. I believe that he masked them with pinked tape, then went back and added in the dots typical of spectator edging. There's no good shot of them on the site unfortunately, but they match the dress in this photo.

The other notable shoe pair is the T-straps that go with the "Betsy Ross" costume--a pair of character shoes to which Schellinger hand-glued an array of red, silver, and blue sequins in swirling stripes, and including a scattering of star-shaped crystals. Sparkle-tacular!

Overall, not a terribly challenging play crafts-build-wise, but there are a few gems and the stencilwork on the set was well worth checking out.

January 2017

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 28th, 2025 07:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios